User talk:RelentlessRecusant

Number of points:

1. This is an in-character wiki, meaning we treat C&C as if it was real. Don't mention game titles or similiar. 2. Use proper capitalisation rules. In-game names are not correct in this aspect. 3. Templates should be made from scratch, the C&C3 one is full of errors, not IC and to big. Plus, overcapitalized. Work on it, will ya?

Otherwise, good work and keep it up! Shaur M. S. Grizlin 10:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Moar
Some more points:

1. Capitalisation is to comply with grammar, eg. Riflemen Squad is used as riflemen squad, as it's, well, a generic term. Unique terms, such as Iron Curtain or the White Gouse remain capped as does stuff from generals and RA2. 2. Templates should look like the ORCA Aircraft template and if they are large, the font should be shrunk down. It has to look good. 3. Check the lists on the main page whem doing them or an article. Shaur M. S. Grizlin 19:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I'm Snow93, the Founder/Bureaucrat round here... Wow you're important round here/on wiki! I've just got back from holiday, so I'll be a bit more active. About what I noticed User:MikaelGrizzly just said: my personal preference is complete capitalisation (i.e. more than the wikipedia) except for words like "the" or "of". So when the first ~500 articles were created (by me, User:Agaiz and User:Dthaiger (the other two major sysops round here)), they mostly had higher-than-average capitalisation rates. MGrizzly seems to be a bit militant in his un-capitalisation (and in other ways too, which is probably why he only has revert-rights and not full sysop rights yet), which is basically fine, as long as we have enough redirects to make sure people don't get lost. So capitalise how you want :) (or capitalize, depending on where you're from). About template design... errm... Seems perfectly fine to me. If someone (hint MGrizzly) trashes it in the name of "improvements" (though to be fair he has made a lot of aesthetically nice things, including the current design of the main page), feel free to complain.

Seeing as you're probably the most experienced admin/sysop _ever_, you probably want to know some "technical" info about the wiki. To resolve disputes about the C&C universe canon we have... Command & Conquer Wiki:Canon, and a similar page only for more minor details at Command & Conquer Wiki:Speculation. The project namespace shortcut namespace is CCW: (e.g. CCW:S). There are guidelines on article layout which absolutely don't have to be followed at all in the slightest if you don't want to, they're only there for a guide, at CCW:AL.

I expect I'll end up adminising you some day, anyway, have fun etc. --Snow93(talk)(contrib) 22:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)