Category talk:People

I'm not going to jump the gun, but would it be best to group individuals by surname, when such an oportunity presents itself? Seems more 'official' at least. In addition, I understand that it's current policy not to put titles into character profile pages (eg. if, heaven forbid, Kane was a Private, it would simply be Kane as opposed to Private Kane). I noticed a few exceptions to the rule, if it indeed exists.--Hawki 03:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The problem is that the software wouldn't let us do that. For us to categorize by Surname, we would have to make a ton of redirect pages with the category:people on them.  While surname organization is much better, it simply not feasible. --Eldarone 04:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)