Command and Conquer Wiki talk:Article Layout

Often times, there isn't nearly enough information to do that with a particular unit. We don't often have the research history --131.215.159.149 14:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

I assume that's Dthaiger or Agaiz- you forgot to log in. Yes, but if we do have enough information we should.If we don't, we should just fill in as many sections as possible. A lot of the smaller sections I out in there don't have to be new subheadings- only if there is loads to say. --Snow93 11:06, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

That was me --Dthaiger 21:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The reason I have marked this article for deletion is because one of the core rules of this Wiki is that we don't use the titles of the games in the Wiki itself, ie. (Red Alert 2 --> Great World War III), or something to that effect. Therefore, this article does blatently violate these rules, and so I've targeted it for deletion. Unfortunately, this also means I have had to mark the chronosphere page for deletion as well. Please do not create any more articles based on this template until the admins have decided exactly what to do.

--Dthaiger 21:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC) (Admin)

Agreed with Dthaiger... I find it more interesting to make it sound that its not a game, but that you actully can think that it happend yesterday... or over 70 years... or over 100 years... ect.

- Driving Ghost

P.S. - i would love to edit the Chronosphere but I dont have much info...

confused. is the Chronosphere page gona be deleted because i dont see a game titel there.

No it will not be deleted, just the headlines that said RA1, RA2 and stuff have been removed. Feel free to edit the article and add as much info on the Chronosphere as you can find... Oh, by the way, I like the non-template article style we've always used better (where you don't seperate the article into "GWWII", "GWWIII" and so on. It looks less fluent this way when there is a new headline every two lines ...--Agaiz 14:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)