What the hell is up with the template on this article? Referencing 2 times to all the missions in RA3? Tanya dead? That happens in the Soviet storyline, in the Allied one, she's well.. pretty much alive. This template needs serious refurbishing. AthCom 10:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Fixing that kind of template is way beyond my abilities. You could ask the helpers for help. You can find a list here. I've worked with JoePlay before, he's cool. PSH aka Kimera 757 (talk) 13:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
really they tried to fx time by killing the man that made the time machine well that worked out great yuri is probaly some poor patato farmer in romania. how did eistien repress japan now that hes gone there big really not much would really havve changed romanov probaly still primier dogan still president yuri still madman in prison eistien didnt really seeem so mportant
"Three perspectives of the war"
Wait what, I know there are three perspectives in the game but since the pages about red alert 1 and red alert 2 wars are only talking about the allied perspective, I think this page should do the same, we should remove the stuff about soviet and japanese victory (just them, not the pages like to tame a living god, etc.) CKeen
^ don't forget to sign your messages!!! --Tkangaru 10:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
We should have info on all three perspectives/campaigns. No reason why we can't. We just have to say that only the Allied campaign that lead to Uprising. Same with pages for RA1 and RA2 wars - we should be able to include soviet campaign stuff but keep them separate from the canon storyline.
The campaigns for Red Alert 3 aren't linked by the way. --Tkangaru 10:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Tkangaru's got the right idea. Every one of these war pages based on the campaigns needs a primary section based on the canonical campaign, then subsections with "alternate history" for the other campaigns. It's the only way we can include, in the least confusing way, all official C&C information. Just to discard official information just because it is not canon would not be appropriate for the wiki's objective. Don't forget to sign your talk page posts. - Meco (talk) 10:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Oh yes sorry I forgot to leave my nickname. 'nyways, I agree with the idea, I was just saying that while red alert 1/2 pages are only talking about the allied perspective the red alert 3 page is not (I'm sure this was done because when the page was written it was unknown which storylinet he expansion would have followed.). CKeen
I think its time to put the Campaign sections in order. Example: First Soviets, Second Allies and finally Rising Sun last.(Saffy Nurbs 18:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC))